CO129-124 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [8-9] — Page 288

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

280

up $350,000 of the Assets of the Colony and involved this Government in an annual expenditure of more than $62,000, without making any allowance for wear and tear of Machinery or interest on capital sunk. It may therefore be conceded, I think, that unless there be some marked and reliable increase to the Revenue from other sources, the ordinary means of the Colony could not meet another similar burden.

Some have been induced to infer that the Colonial Revenue had increased from £120,000 in 1863 to £163,000 in 1866, and states that the Revenue had increased. I respectfully call in question the accuracy of these figures in the sense intended - which I presume to be, that the Colony had a larger amount of Ordinary annual Revenue at its disposal in 1866 than in 1863.

It is nevertheless easy to see that in 1866 the Revenue was £45,000 more than in 1863.

Hence it becomes important to consider how the calculation is made. I observe that in proof of this, Your Grace contrasts the Revenue of 1863 with that of 1866 to show that it would be unsafe for Her Majesty's Government to shape their policy towards this Colony from reliance on any deduction from the above figures. The latter are perfectly correct, but the inference drawn from them, however natural, will be found on examination to be actually incorrect.

Edit History

2026-05-19 21:22:08 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
280 up $350,000 of the Assets of the Colony and involved this Government in an annual expenditure of more than $62,000, without making any allowance for wear and tear of Machinery or interest on capital sunk. It may therefore be conceded, I think, that unless there be some marked and reliable increase to the Revenue from other sources, the ordinary means of the Colony could not meet another similar burden. Some have been induced to infer that the Colonial Revenue had increased from £120,000 in 1863 to £163,000 in 1866, and states that the Revenue had increased. I respectfully call in question the accuracy of these figures in the sense intended - which I presume to be, that the Colony had a larger amount of Ordinary annual Revenue at its disposal in 1866 than in 1863. It is nevertheless easy to see that in 1866 the Revenue was £45,000 more than in 1863. Hence it becomes important to consider how the calculation is made. I observe that in proof of this, Your Grace contrasts the Revenue of 1863 with that of 1866 to show that it would be unsafe for Her Majesty's Government to shape their policy towards this Colony from reliance on any deduction from the above figures. The latter are perfectly correct, but the inference drawn from them, however natural, will be found on examination to be actually incorrect.
Baseline (Original)
280 up $350,000 of the Afsets of the Colony- and involved this Government: annual. expenditure of an more than $62,000. by without making amy allowance for wear · and tear of Machinery or interest of... capital sunt. It may therefore be conceded, " I think, that inlefo there be some marked and reliable increase to the CH Revenue from other sources, the ordinary of the Colony could not meet - [means another similar burthen. Same h ba gat han bear the verted el whuy with 1866. and states that the Revenue had moreased from £120,000 in the former to £163000 in the latter. respectfully cull in · very question the accuracy of these figures in the sense intended- which I presume to be, that the belony had a larger amount of Ordinary Ordinary annual £45.000 Revenue at its disposal by £300 than in 1863. 15. It is nevertheless easy 00 in 1866 14. Hence it becomes important to consider how the calculation is Iconect far from which induced to means. infer Your Grace has been increased bolonial I observe that in proof of this Your Grace contracts the apar 1863- with to shew that it would be unsafe for Her Abajesty's Government to shape their policy towards this bolony from reliance on on any deduction any from the above figures. The latter are perfectly correct but the ference drawn- inference from them however natural, will be found om ex examination to be actually
2026-05-19 21:22:08 · Baseline
View content

280

up $350,000 of the Afsets of the Colony-

and involved this Government:

annual.

expenditure of

an

more than $62,000.

by without making amy allowance for wear · and tear of Machinery or interest of... capital sunt. It may therefore be conceded, " I think, that inlefo there be some

marked and reliable increase to the

CH

Revenue from other sources, the ordinary of the Colony could not meet -

[means

another similar burthen.

Same h

ba

gat han bear the

verted el whuy

with 1866. and states that the Revenue

had moreased from £120,000 in the

former to £163000 in the latter.

respectfully cull in

· very

question the accuracy

of these figures in the sense intended-

which I presume to be, that the belony

had

a

larger

amount

of Ordinary

Ordinary annual

£45.000

Revenue at its disposal by £300

than in 1863.

15.

It is nevertheless easy

00 in 1866

14.

Hence it becomes

important

to

consider how

the calculation is

Iconect

far from which

induced to

means.

infer

Your Grace has been

increased bolonial

I observe that in proof of this Your Grace contracts the

apar

1863- with

to shew that

it would be unsafe for Her Abajesty's

Government to shape their policy towards

this bolony from reliance on

on any deduction

any

from the above figures. The latter are

perfectly

correct but the

ference drawn-

inference

from them however natural, will be

found

om ex

examination to be actually

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.